That Magical Mystic Ag-Ingredient used by the Ancient Civilizations of Amazonia. Or so we're told.
|Image: Vuthisa Technologies|
This post isn't intended on spending much time on the so-called virtues the ancient use of Biochar or it's other name Terra Preta. The top image is probably what comes to most people's mind when they hear the term in discussion or read the name Biochar in a text. A bucket of charcoal being added to the soil. Yet actual Biochar is far more than that as the magnified image reveals about it's true beneficial structure if made properly. True Biochar is actually cooked at higher temperatures than merely burning some material to create some ashes to be mixed into soil. The is clearly a much more sophisticated process by which to manufacture real Biochar. So different temperature will produce different biochars. The lower temperatures of 400–500 °C (752–932 °F) produce more char, while temperatures above 700 °C (1,292 °F) favor the yield of liquid and gas fuel components. These very high temperatures needed in my opinion are to much for the average home owner or even property owner for which things could get out of control. But the term, 'biochar' being used here is referring to charcoal that is the result of a manufactured byproduct of biofuel production or other various agricultural crop residues, livestock manures, or for that matter any other type of organic material that may come from your garden or landscape. Biochar proponent websites boast about several benefits to the soil. One such benefit is that it serves as a long-term, stable repository of carbon. Since the carbon in biochar decomposes so much slower than the original organic material, it is often considered to be a “carbon negative” material. Hence in this case, it could be said that it is a positive thing to be negative.
|image: Biochar International|
Researchers from Rice University came up with some incredible findings on communication disruption between soil microbes, though I think there is much more work to do here. Keep in mind that they are mostly referring to Biochar as it is used among the Perma-cult elites who promote it with regards agricultural practices and soil building methods. But it was one specific point in there that interested me which actually reveals more information about fire ecology and habitat rehabilitation the way it works in Nature. Although the Researcher make absolutely no mention or any such reference whatsoever about fire ecology and plant ecosystem restoration, it nevertheless needs pointing out. Here was the quote I found interesting at the beginning of the article.
HOUSTON — (Sept. 30, 2013) —
"In the first study of its kind, Rice University scientists have used synthetic biology to study how a popular soil amendment called “biochar” can interfere with the chemical signals that some microbes use to communicate. The class of compounds studied includes those used by some plant pathogens to coordinate their attacks."That last sentence in the first paragraph sent off alarms bells and flashing lights for me because it seemed so familiar and something I had observed in the past. I have for years trying to find out through research, actual hands on observation by means of field work as opposed to relying on what others have written and merely citing these, just how any natural ecosystem regenerates itself with precision and order after a disaster. Hence seed germination and combating against soil pathogens in a Nursery environment without resorting to the present harmful science-based chemical killing method to totally wipe out all microbes and sterilize soil potting media for 100% seedling germination and plant growth success using other chemical growth promoters afterwards. Needless to say I did find a viable natural solution with almost 100% success rate, but it's always kool to find out you've been justified in your speculation, assumptions, facts and even further about the mechanics of what actually goes on after a wildfire disaster. Let me illustrate a point on something I observed on my former land.
|Photo: Mine (Spring 2013)|
“A potted plant may look tranquil, but there are actually a lot of conversations going on in that pot,” said study co-author Joff Silberg, associate professor of biochemistry and cell biology and of bioengineering at Rice. “In fact, there are so many different conversations going on in soil that it was impractical for us to determine exactly how biochar was affecting just one of them.”
" . . . but there are actually a lot of conversations going on in that pot,” - " . . . chemical compound signals that some microbes use to communicate." & " . . . used by some plant pathogens to coordinate their attacks."
|By Mindy McIntosh-Shetter|
|Photo by S. Kelly Kearns - USFS|
|Photos by S. Kelly Kearns - USFS|
"Common buckthorn seedling emergence may be better on bare soil than on soil with a dense litter or herbaceous layer, although persistence may be similar among microsites. In field tests, a higher percentage of common buckthorn seed germinated on bare soil than on soil with a dense litter or herbaceous layer. While germination was better on bare soil, survival to the next spring was similar among treatments with bare soil, bare and scratched soil, and dense herbaceous cover. Fewer common buckthorn seedlings were observed in sites with thick red oak leaf litter than in sites with less leaf litter at Eagle Lake Park, Minnesota. Common buckthorn seedling emergence, height, and biomass decreased with increasing litter depth in both field (open oak woodlands) and greenhouse studies, but litter depths up to 2 inches (5.1 cm) did not prevent seedling emergence and survival."This was exactly my experience as well. Under most all leaf litter dander, seedlings had no problem germinating, but they all failed there after. While the US Forest Service page insists this was the result of shade intolerance on the part of the seedlings, in my observation, which were numerous year after year, every single one succumbed to damping off. Damping off is very unmistakable. Seriously, a young child would get what damping off is. However, I also had reseeding success on open bare ground which had no organic matter and was mostly of decomposed granite composition and this is where I've also observed Manzanita seed germination which does NOT require Fire for germination. I don't know how many times I have to emphasize this. But I've also seen open bare ground with no leaf litter under an almost shaded area situation with only early morning sun with numerous Coffeeberry Seedlings and one Flannel Bush sapling. Look here below. I took this in April of 2013 this year.
(click to enlarge Image)
Larger reseeded Flannel Bush under Torrey Pine. None of these
existed when I left in 2002, with exception of Coffeeberry.
"The cell-signaling study grew out of a previous investigation by one of the group’s founding members, Carrie Masiello, associate professor of Earth science. Masiello and another member of the group, Rice biologist Jennifer Rudgers (now at the University of New Mexico), were investigating the combined effects of adding biochar and nutrients to soils. In all but one case, the biochar and nutrients seemed to enhance one another. In the lone exception, a soil fungus (mycorrhiza) that was typically beneficial to plants began growing so rapidly that it impeded plant growth."
|Shelly Hsiao-Ying Cheng|
Nature has no patience or time to wait for such critical window of opportunity to close on Biochar breakdown and microbe recovery initiation which is often immediate, or when first rains (summer or winter) come. That initial window is imperative and this observation alone should spur and speed up seedling germination and outplanting as quickly as possible. In my experience, they have always waited too late and then blamed the chaparral plant community for invading former forest cover areas. The deliberate and purposed ignorance on this is amazing. Never underestimate the power of a theory developed in a Lab, backed up by Internet citations to trump actual real world observations. This isn't a slam against those researchers who performed this very kool study wonderfully to reveal and uncover an incredible systems pause, since the study had nothing to do with wildfire recovery. Still, in any further future study, it really should. I'll post some other links related to this below.
|Animation by Bert Wilson of Las Pilitas Nursery|
|Richard Halsey: Chaparral Institute|
Some Interesting Reading References: